The age of artificial sensationalism: ChatGPT-generated analysis of headlines in news events
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.12.e.5Keywords:
AI, journalism, automation, events, sensationalism, disinformation, ChatGPTAbstract
This study analyzes the impact of the large language model (LLM) ChatGPT on journalistic writing. This research examines news headlines automatically generated by ChatGPT to identify possible gender, race, or other biases, as well as to determine a possible inclination towards sensationalism. To conduct the analysis, 1,000 crime or accident headlines were automatically generated through specific prompts introduced into ChatGPT. The methodology employs a coding framework based on previous studies, incorporating proprietary parameters to detect biases by age, sex, or nationality. The results reveal that headlines generated by ChatGPT focus primarily on crimes or criminal acts, followed by other topics, accidents, and economic affairs. Headlines tend to focus on dramatic, sensationalist, or conflictive themes, including elements of surprise or unusual circumstances. Specific references to nationalities were observed, as well as a higher frequency of male identification in cases where the sex of those involved is mentioned. The conclusions show that AI-generated headlines favor dramatic and sensationalist content, especially in crime categories. The need to develop tools and strategies to ensure the quality and objectivity of AI-generated news is identified, suggesting collaboration between journalists and Artificial Intelligence experts.
On the other hand, AI is also impacting event journalism. It is the purest journalism, the least mediatized and contaminated by press offices (Rodríguez Cárcela, 2015).
This research aims to study and compare the headlines generated by the ChatGPT tool, compared to those generated by human journalists to find out which ones favor sensationalism and disinformation more.
Downloads
References
Anderson, C. W. (2013). Rebuilding the News: Metropolitan Journalism in the Digital Age. Temple University, USA.
Anderson, C.W., Bell, E., & Shirky, C. (2012). Post-Industrial Journalism: Adapting to the Present. Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism School.
Ananny, M. & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20, 973-989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645
Carlson, M., & Usher, N. (2015). News Startups as Agents of Innovation: For-profit digital news startup manifestos as metajournalistic discourse. Digital Journalism, 4(5), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1076344
Caswell, D., & Dörr, K. (2017). Automated Journalism 2.0: Event-driven narratives: From simple descriptions to real stories. Journalism Practice, 12(4), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1320773
Clerwall, C. (2014). Enter the Robot Journalist: Users' Perceptions of Automated Content. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.883116
Coddington, M. (2015). Clarifying Journalism’s Quantitative Turn: A Typology for Evaluating Data Journalism, Computational Journalism, and Computer-Assisted Reporting. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976400
Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Algorithmic Accountability. Digital Journalism, 3, 398-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/216708 1.2014.976411
Diakopoulos, N., & Koliska, M. (2016). Algorithmic Transparency in the News Media. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 809–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1208053
Dörr, K. (2015). Mapping the field of Algorithmic Journalism. Digital Journalism, 4(6), 700-722. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1096748
Dörr, K. N., & Hollnbuchner, K. (2016). Ethical Challenges of Algorithmic Journalism. Digital Journalism, 5(4), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1167612
Flew, T. & Spurgeon, C. & Daniel, A. & Swift, A. (2012). The promise of computational journalism. Journalism Practice, 6, 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.616655
García-Ull, F.-J., & Melero-Lázaro, M. (2023). Gender stereotypes in AI-generated images. Profesional De La información, 32(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.05
Graefe, A. (2016). Guide to Automated Journalism. Columbia University Libraries. https://doi.org/10.7916/D80G3XDJ
Graefe, A., Haim, M., Haarmann, B., & Brosius, H. B. (2016). Readers' perception of computer-generated news: Credibility, expertise, and readability. Journalism, 19(5), 595-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916641269
Kosterich, A. & Weber, M. (2019). Starting up the News: The Impact of Venture Capital on the Digital News Media Ecosystem. International Journal on Media Management, 20, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2018.1563547
Latzer, M., Hollnbuchner, K., Just, N., & Saurwein, F. (2016). The economics of algorithmic selection on the Internet. En J. M. Bauer, & M. Latzer (Eds.), Handbook on the Economics of the Internet (pp. 395-425). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939852.00028
Lewis, S. (2015). Journalism in An Era of Big Data. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 321–330. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21670811.2014.976399
Liu, B., & Wei, L. (2018). Machine Authorship In Situ: Effect of news organization and news genre on news credibility. Digital Journalism, 7(5), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1510740
Lewis, S., & Westlund, O. (2015). Actors, Actants, Audiences, and Activities in Cross-media News Work. Digital Journalism, 3(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.927986
Manjoo, F. (2023) ChatGPT Is Already Changing How I Do My Job. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/21/opinion/chatgpt-journalism.html
Márquez, J. (2023). Es oficial: Microsoft anuncia una inversión "multimillonaria" en OpenAI, la compañía detrás de ChatGPT. Xataka. https://www.xataka.com/empresas-y-economia/oficial-microsoft-anuncia-inversion-multimillonaria-openai-compania-detras-chatgpt
Mayer-Schönberger, V. & Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform how We Live, Work, and Think.
Montal, T. & Reich, Z. (2016). I, Robot. You, Journalist. Who is the Author?: Authorship, bylines and full disclosure in automated journalism. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 829-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1209083
Monti, M. (2019) Automated Journalism and Freedom of Information: Ethical and Juridical Problems Related to AI in the Press Field. Opinio Juris in Comparatione, 1/2018. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3318460
Olivar de Julián, F. J., & Díaz-Campo, J. (2020). Jóvenes y sucesos: Tratamiento informativo en la prensa digital española. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 26(4), 1521-1532. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.68003
O´Neil, C. (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data increases. Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Lectulandia.
Örnebring, H., & Ferrer Conill, R. (2016). Outsourcing Newswork. En T. Witschge, C. W. Anderson, D. Domingo, & A. Hermida (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism (pp. 207-221). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957909.n14
Parasie, S. (2015). Data-driven Revelation? Digital Journalism, 3(3), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976408
Parratt-Fernández, S., Mayoral-Sánchez, J., & Mera-Fernández, M. (2021). The application of artificial intelligence to journalism: an analysis of academic production. Profesional de la Información, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.may.17
Rodríguez Cárcela, R. M. (2011). La información de sucesos. Temática en prensa escrita. Correspondencias & Análisis, 1, 309-325. https://doi.org/10.24265/cian.2011.n1.18
Rodríguez Cárcela, R. M. (2015). Manual de periodismo de sucesos. Universidad de Sevilla. Grupo de Investigación en Estructura, Historia y Contenidos de la Comunicación.
Rodríguez Cárcela, R. (2016). Las fuentes informativas en el periodismo de sucesos. Análisis en la prensa escrita. Correspondencias & Análisis, (6), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.24265/cian.2016.n6.11
Saurwein, F., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2015). Governance of Algorithms: Options and Limitations. info, 17(6), 35-49. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2710400
Shangyuan W., Tandoc, E., & Charles T. S. (2019). A Field Analysis of Journalism in the Automation Age: Understanding Journalistic Transformations and Struggles Through Structure and Agency. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 428-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1620112
Thurman, N., Dörr, K., & Kunert, J. (2017). When Reporters Get Hands-on with Robo-Writing: Professionals consider automated journalism’s capabilities and consequences. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1240–1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1289819
Thurman, N. (2019). Computational Journalism. En K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies, Second Edition. Routledge. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3265967
Túñez-López, J.-M., Toural-Bran, C., & Cacheiro-Requeijo, S. (2018). Uso de bots y algoritmos para automatizar la redacción de noticias: percepción y actitudes de los periodistas en España. Profesional De La información, 27(4), 750–758. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.04
Van Dalen, A. (2012). The Algorithms behind the headlines: How machine-written news redefines the core skills of human journalists. Journalism Practice, 6(5–6), 648–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667268
Walther, M. (2014). Repatriation to France and Germany: A comparative study based on Bourdieu’s theory of practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05700-8
Willnat, L. & Weaver, D. & Choi, J. (2013). The Global Journalist in the Twenty-First Century. Journalism Practice, 7(2), 163-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.753210
Wu, S.& Tandoc, E. & Salmon, C. (2018). Journalism Reconfigured: Assessing human–machine relations and the autonomous power of automation in news production. Journalism Studies, 20, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2018.1521299



