The state of strategic organizational crisis communication research in the context of global and digital communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.6.11.15Keywords:
Organizational communication, strategic communication, crisisAbstract
Since the mid 1990s the field of crisis communication research has grown substantially as a topic of international communication studies. Especially in public relations journals a growth of the publication output has been observed recently, whereas broader communication journals still publish scarcely on crisis communication (An & Cheng, 2012; Ha & Boynton, 2014). The increasing number of conferences and specialized working groups at major academic communication associations such as the International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) and the European Communication Research and Education Association (ECREA) as well as the publication of specialized journals such as the Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication indicate the ongoing institutionalization of the field (Schwarz, Seeger, & Auer, 2016a). Moreover, an increasing number of academic and public research centers, primarily at American and European universities, point to the rapid growth and societal relevance of the field (Palenchar, 2010).
Within the field of public relations and strategic communication research the management of crisis communication already counts as a vital sub-discipline (Coombs, 2012b). This gain in importance can also be explained by the numerous devastating crisis events which do not only have tremendous social, political, ecological, and economic impact, but also reveal in many cases the complexity and limitations of managing crisis communication as practiced by organizations in various fields of society. This complexity and scope of crises go along with the interdisciplinarity and multiperspectivity of the research field, which in most cases lacks reciprocal reference (Coombs, 2012a; Löffelholz & Schwarz, 2008).
Downloads
References
An, S.-K., & Cheng, I.-H. (2012). Crisis communication research in public relations journals: Tracking research trends over thirty years. In W. T. Coombs & S. J. Hol aday (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 65-90). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwel .
An, S.-K., Park, D.-J., Cho, S., & Berger, B. (2010). A cross-cultural study of effective organizational crisis response strategy in the United States and South Korea. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4, 225-243.
Austin, L., & Jin, Y. (2017). Social media and crisis communication: Explicating the social-mediated crisis communication model. In A. Dudo & L. A. Kahlor (Eds.), Strategic communication: New agendas in communication (pp. 163-186). New York: Routledge.
Austin, L., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2012). How audiences seek out crisis information: Exploring the social-mediated crisis communication model. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(2), 188-207.
Bechler, C. (2004). Reframing the Organizational Exigency: Taking a New Approach in Crisis Research. In D. P. Mil ar & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Responding to Crisis: A Rhetorical Approach to Crisis Communication (pp. 63-74). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies.
Albany: State University of New York Press.
Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23(2), 177-186.
Brown, K. A., & White, C. L. (2011). Organization-public relationships and crisis response strategies: Impact on attribution of responsibility. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(1), 75-92.
Brüggemann, M., & Wessler, H. (2014). Transnational communication as deliberation, ritual, and strategy. Communication Theory, 24(4), 394-414.
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bul etin, 125, 47-63.
Choi, Y., & Lin, Y.-H. (2009). Consumer response to crisis: Exploring the concept of involvement in Mattel product recalls. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 18-22.
