Resiliencia de las esferas públicas en la crisis sanitaria mundial
Palabras clave:
Covid-19, esfera pública, subesferas sociales, crisis, resiliencia ciudadana
Resumen
La pandemia de la Covid-19 alteró los modos “normales” de funcionamiento de la esfera pública y activó un modo experimental de hacerla frente, que reinventaba las formas de lo público y los intercambios comunicativos. En este artículo, conceptualizamos las respuestas sociales desencadenadas por la crisis como formas particulares de resiliencia de la esfera pública, y evaluamos el papel de la digitalización y los espacios digitales en la aparición de distintos modos y dinámicas de resiliencia. Examinamos tres áreas de experimentación de la esfera pública con respecto a nuestra concepción: el consumo político, la movilización de la protesta política y el consumo de noticias. Discutimos las características generales de la resiliencia de la esfera pública en todas las subesferas sociales y destacamos las dinámicas e hibridaciones que estructuran los espacios públicos emergentes. Las prácticas de resiliencia van acompañadas de dinámicas de politización y despolitización, así como de cambios en los límites de lo público y lo privado. Nuestras observaciones también revelan la interacción dinámica entre la resiliencia y la resistencia.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
Benton, J. (2020). The Coronavirus Traffic Bump to News Sites Is Pretty Much over Already. Nieman Lab. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/X36wR9V
Bjola, C. y Papadakis, K. (2020). Digital Propaganda, Counterpublics and the Disruption of the Public Sphere: The Finnish Approach to Building Digital Resilience. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(5), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1704221
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F. y Scala, A. (2020). The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10, 16598. http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.05004
Copeland, L. (2014). Conceptualizing Political Consumerism: How Citizenship Norms Differentiate Boycotting from Buycotting. Political Studies, 62(S1), 172–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12067
Cushion, S., Soo, N., Kyriakidou, M. y Morani, M. (2020). Different Lockdown Rules in the Four Nations Are Confusing the Public. LSE. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/P36rrXP
Della Porta, D. (2022). Contentious Politics in Emergency Critical Junctures: Progressive Social Movements during the Pandemic. Cambridge University Press
Friedman, M. (1999). Consumer Boycotts Effecting Change through the Marketplace and the Media. Routledge.
Frischlich, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., Kuhfeldt, L., y Clever, L. (2020). Fueling the Infodemic? Consuming Alternative and Non-Professional News During the Corona Crisis. DemoRESILdigital Whitepaper 1. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6UP8Y
Hartmann, T. (2009). Information Utility as Determinant for Media Choice. En T. Hartmann (Ed.) Media Choice : A Theoretical and Empirical Overview. Routledge.
Engin, I. y Ruppert, E. (2015). Being Digital Citizens. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Kalogeropoulos, A., Fletcher, R. y Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Initial Surge in News Use around Coronavirus in the UK Has Been Followed by Significant Increase in News Avoidance. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/736rJrA
Kelm, O., y Dohle, M. (2018). Information, Communication and Political Consumerism: How (Online) Information and (Online) Communication Influence Boycotts and Buycotts. New Media & Society 20(4), 1523–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817699842
Knobloch, S., Patzig, G., y Hastall, M. (2002). Informational Utility“ – Einfluss von Nützlichkeit auf selektive Zuwendung zu negativen und positiven Online-Nachrichten. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft : M & K, 50(3), 359–375.
Micheletti, M., Follesdal, A., y Stolle, D. (2003). Politics, Products, and Markets. Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present. Transaction Publisher.
Neidhardt, F. (1994). “Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen.” En F. Neidhart (Ed.) Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. Sonderheft 34 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (pp. 7–41). Westdt. Verl.
Nielsen, R. K., Fletcher, R., Newman, N., Brennen, J. S., y Howard, P. N. (2020). Navigating the ‘Infodemic’: How People in Six Countries Access and Rate News and Information about Coronavirus. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and the University of Oxford. https://cutt.ly/B36tWCk
Pleyers, G. (2020). The Pandemic is a battlefield. Social movements in the COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Civil Society, 16(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1794398
Shahsavari, S., Holur, P., Tangherlini, T. R., y Roychowdhury, V. (2020). Conspiracy in the Time of Corona: Automatic Detection of Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories in Social Media and the News. Journal of Computational Social Science, 3, 279–317. http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13783
Stolle, D., y Micheletti, M. (2013). Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. Cambridge University Press.
Till, K. E. (2005). The New Berlin - Memory, Politics, Place. University of Minnesota Press.
Viehmann, C., Ziegele, M., y Quiring, O. (2020). Informationsnutzung in Der Corona-Krise. Report Zu Ersten Befunden Aus Zwei Erhebungswellen. Johannes Guttemberg Universität Mainz. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/736yRZp
Wildavsky, A. B. (1988). Searching for Safety. Transaction Books.
Bjola, C. y Papadakis, K. (2020). Digital Propaganda, Counterpublics and the Disruption of the Public Sphere: The Finnish Approach to Building Digital Resilience. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(5), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1704221
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F. y Scala, A. (2020). The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10, 16598. http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.05004
Copeland, L. (2014). Conceptualizing Political Consumerism: How Citizenship Norms Differentiate Boycotting from Buycotting. Political Studies, 62(S1), 172–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12067
Cushion, S., Soo, N., Kyriakidou, M. y Morani, M. (2020). Different Lockdown Rules in the Four Nations Are Confusing the Public. LSE. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/P36rrXP
Della Porta, D. (2022). Contentious Politics in Emergency Critical Junctures: Progressive Social Movements during the Pandemic. Cambridge University Press
Friedman, M. (1999). Consumer Boycotts Effecting Change through the Marketplace and the Media. Routledge.
Frischlich, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., Kuhfeldt, L., y Clever, L. (2020). Fueling the Infodemic? Consuming Alternative and Non-Professional News During the Corona Crisis. DemoRESILdigital Whitepaper 1. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6UP8Y
Hartmann, T. (2009). Information Utility as Determinant for Media Choice. En T. Hartmann (Ed.) Media Choice : A Theoretical and Empirical Overview. Routledge.
Engin, I. y Ruppert, E. (2015). Being Digital Citizens. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Kalogeropoulos, A., Fletcher, R. y Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Initial Surge in News Use around Coronavirus in the UK Has Been Followed by Significant Increase in News Avoidance. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/736rJrA
Kelm, O., y Dohle, M. (2018). Information, Communication and Political Consumerism: How (Online) Information and (Online) Communication Influence Boycotts and Buycotts. New Media & Society 20(4), 1523–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817699842
Knobloch, S., Patzig, G., y Hastall, M. (2002). Informational Utility“ – Einfluss von Nützlichkeit auf selektive Zuwendung zu negativen und positiven Online-Nachrichten. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft : M & K, 50(3), 359–375.
Micheletti, M., Follesdal, A., y Stolle, D. (2003). Politics, Products, and Markets. Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present. Transaction Publisher.
Neidhardt, F. (1994). “Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen.” En F. Neidhart (Ed.) Öffentlichkeit, öffentliche Meinung, soziale Bewegungen. Sonderheft 34 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (pp. 7–41). Westdt. Verl.
Nielsen, R. K., Fletcher, R., Newman, N., Brennen, J. S., y Howard, P. N. (2020). Navigating the ‘Infodemic’: How People in Six Countries Access and Rate News and Information about Coronavirus. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and the University of Oxford. https://cutt.ly/B36tWCk
Pleyers, G. (2020). The Pandemic is a battlefield. Social movements in the COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Civil Society, 16(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1794398
Shahsavari, S., Holur, P., Tangherlini, T. R., y Roychowdhury, V. (2020). Conspiracy in the Time of Corona: Automatic Detection of Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories in Social Media and the News. Journal of Computational Social Science, 3, 279–317. http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13783
Stolle, D., y Micheletti, M. (2013). Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. Cambridge University Press.
Till, K. E. (2005). The New Berlin - Memory, Politics, Place. University of Minnesota Press.
Viehmann, C., Ziegele, M., y Quiring, O. (2020). Informationsnutzung in Der Corona-Krise. Report Zu Ersten Befunden Aus Zwei Erhebungswellen. Johannes Guttemberg Universität Mainz. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/736yRZp
Wildavsky, A. B. (1988). Searching for Safety. Transaction Books.
Publicado
28-02-2023
Cómo citar
Trenz, H.-J., Heft, A., Vaughan, M., & Pfetsch, B. (2023). Resiliencia de las esferas públicas en la crisis sanitaria mundial. Revista De La Asociación Española De Investigación De La Comunicación, 10(19), 2-21. https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.10.19.1
Sección
Firma invitada
